SCHD vs. PLD, MAIN, and BIP: The Drawdown Bill Behind the 'They Beat SCHD' Claim

While Prologis (PLD), Brookfield Infrastructure (BIP), and Main Street Capital (MAIN) have outperformed SCHD in total return over the past decade, they come with significantly higher risk. Each exhibited greater maximum drawdowns and volatility, resulting in lower Sharpe ratios compared to SCHD. For high-income professionals, the key takeaway is to weigh total returns against risk metrics; SCHD offers a more stable investment profile despite lower returns.

If you own SCHD, you've probably seen the pitch: some individual dividend name quietly beat the fund you hold. A recent screen from Simply Safe Dividends named three — Prologis (PLD), Brookfield Infrastructure (BIP), and Main Street Capital (MAIN) — each claimed to have topped SCHD's total return over the past decade without overlapping it.

We ran all four (plus the plain S&P 500, SPY) on our survivorship-free engine using Tiingo data over a trailing ~10-year window through July 10, 2026. The claim survives on total return. But there's a bill attached that the return number alone never shows you.

First, the return claim — it's true

SCHD vs PLD vs MAIN vs BIP vs SPY — Performance Comparison
SCHD vs PLD vs MAIN vs BIP vs SPY — Performance Comparison

Each of the three did edge SCHD on ten-year total return. That part checks out.

Performance and yield figures are historical and may change. Total return includes price movement and distributions where available. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Yield is not the same as total return.

Now the full bill, itemized

Total return is one column. Here it is next to the three you rarely see quoted in the same breath: maximum drawdown, annualized volatility, and Sharpe ratio (return per unit of risk).

10-Year (through 7/10/2026)Total ReturnMax DrawdownVolatilitySharpe
SCHD232%-33%17%0.50
PLD275%-43%27%0.36
MAIN251%-65%27%0.33
BIP240%-51%28%0.31
SPY327%-34%18%0.63

Source: Tiingo, trailing ~10-year window through July 10, 2026. These are strategy profiles, not recommendations. Suitability depends on individual objectives, risk tolerance, tax situation, time horizon, and broader portfolio construction.

Read across the rows and the picture changes. Each of the three out-returned SCHD, and each did it with a worse Sharpe ratio — 0.36, 0.33, and 0.31 versus SCHD's 0.50 — and a deeper hole. SCHD's worst drawdown over the decade was -33%. PLD went to -43%, BIP to -51%, and MAIN to -65%, nearly double SCHD's.

Volatility tells the same story. SCHD moved at 17% annualized; all three names ran 27–28%, roughly 1.6x as bumpy for the extra return.

The line that reframes the whole pitch

Look at the SPY row. The plain S&P 500 returned 327% over the decade — more than SCHD and more than all three individual names — with a -34% drawdown (about the same as SCHD's) and the highest Sharpe of the group at 0.63.

So a plain index fund out-returned all three challengers while carrying SCHD-like risk. That's the quiet problem with the 'beat SCHD' framing: it answers a narrow question — did this one name top one dividend fund — while a broad, low-cost index beat everyone in the room on both return and risk-adjusted return. The scoreboard was measuring the wrong game.

Brookfield, stated bluntly

Premium

Subscribe to Informed Investing

Subscribe free to read the full article — and unlock the complete archive.

We respect your inbox. Unsubscribe anytime.

We respect your inbox. Unsubscribe anytime.


Disclosure: This article is for informational and educational purposes only and is not financial, investment, tax, or legal advice. References to specific securities, tickers, companies, or strategies are provided for informational purposes only and do not constitute a recommendation, solicitation, or offer to buy or sell any security or financial product. We do not provide individualized advice or act as a fiduciary. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal, and past performance is not indicative of future results. We may hold positions in securities mentioned. You should independently verify information before acting on it and consult a qualified professional as needed.